Is Smick Lumber v. Hubschmidt
This text of 440 A.2d 1160 (Is Smick Lumber v. Hubschmidt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
I.S. SMICK LUMBER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
MARTHA E. HUBSCHMIDT AND JOHN F. HUBSCHMIDT, HER HUSBAND, STEPHEN P. FAULKNER, T/A PRIDE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, THE FEDERAL LAND BANK OF SPRINGFIELD, AND PRODUCTION CREDIT ASSOCIATION OF BRIDGETON, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Before Judges MICHELS, McELROY and J.H. COLEMAN.
Harry A. Adler argued the cause for appellants.
Lawrence W. Point argued the cause for respondent (Action & Point, attorneys).
PER CURIAM.
Defendants appeal an order granting summary judgment to plaintiff, a lumber dealer who filed and served a mechanic's and *307 materialman's lien with respect to materials supplied to a building owned by defendants Hubschmidt. Service of the lien was made by ordinary mail and was admittedly received by those defendants within five days of the date the notice of intention was filed in the county clerk's office. The issue framed below and here is whether this constitutes valid service within the spirit and intent of N.J.S.A. 2A:44-71.
We affirm the entry of summary judgment for plaintiff substantially for the reasons stated in the opinion of Judge Edward S. Miller, reported at 177 N.J. Super. 131 (Law Div. 1980).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
440 A.2d 1160, 182 N.J. Super. 306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/is-smick-lumber-v-hubschmidt-njsuperctappdiv-1982.