Irwin v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Irwin v. State

1912 OK CR 455, 127 P. 1118, 8 Okla. Crim. 729, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 429

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedNovember 19, 1912

DocketNo. A-1623.

StatusPublished

This text of 1912 OK CR 455 (Irwin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Irwin v. State, 1912 OK CR 455, 127 P. 1118, 8 Okla. Crim. 729, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 429 (Okla. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

'T. Irwin was convicted of a violation of the prohibition law, and was on the 20th day of October, 1911, sentenced to be confined in the county jail for thirty days and to pay a fine of fifty dollars. Erom this judgment an appeal was attempted to be taken by filing in this court a petition in error with case-made on February 24, 1912. This is more than one hundred and twenty days from the rendition of the judgment. Eor this reason the Attorney General has filed a motion to dismiss, which motion is hereby sustained and the purported appeal is hereby dismissed, and the case remanded to the county court of Major county, with direction to enforce its judgment and sentence therein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

'T. Irwin was convicted of a violation of the prohibition law, and was on the 20th day of October, 1911, sentenced to be confined in the county jail for thirty days and to pay a fine of fifty dollars. Erom this judgment an appeal was attempted to be taken by filing in this court a petition in error with case-made on February 24, 1912. This is more than one hundred and twenty days from the rendition of the judgment. Eor this reason the Attorney General has filed a motion to dismiss, which motion is hereby sustained and the purported appeal is hereby dismissed, and the case remanded to the county court of Major county, with direction to enforce its judgment and sentence therein.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1912 OK CR 455, 127 P. 1118, 8 Okla. Crim. 729, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 429, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/irwin-v-state-oklacrimapp-1912.