Irwin v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Irwin v. State

75 So. 701, 16 Ala. App. 109, 1917 Ala. App. LEXIS 171

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 29, 1917

Docket8 Div. 524.

StatusPublished

This text of 75 So. 701 (Irwin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Irwin v. State, 75 So. 701, 16 Ala. App. 109, 1917 Ala. App. LEXIS 171 (Ala. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

The court did not commit error in its various rulings on the evidence. But it having been testified by some of the witnesses that the defendant was seven-eighths Indian, the solicitor, in his closing argument, said:

“Did you ever hear how an Indian liked liquor? A negro’s appetite for liquor is not a circumstance to it.”

This remark was improper, was not sustained by the evidence, and should have been excluded in defendant’s motion. Sykes v. State, 151 Ala. 80, 44 South. 398; Roden v. State, 3 Ala. App. 202, 58 South. 72.

For the error pointed out, the judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

•Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI