Irwin v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Irwin v. State

139 So. 907, 224 Ala. 706

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Irwin v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 220 Ala. 160 →

Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided January 28, 1932·No. 3 Div. 954.·Published

Opinion

THOMAS, J.

The appellant was convicted of the offense of robbery, and has appealed from the judgment of conviction, on the record, without a bill of exceptions..

The record has been examined, and is in all things regular and free from error. Therefore a judgment will be entered here affirming the judgment of conviction. It is so ordered by the court.

Affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THOMAS, J.

The appellant was convicted of the offense of robbery, and has appealed from the judgment of conviction, on the record, without a bill of exceptions..

The record has been examined, and is in all things regular and free from error. Therefore a judgment will be entered here affirming the judgment of conviction. It is so ordered by the court.

Affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Irwin v. State, 139 So. 907, 224 Ala. 706 (Ala. 1932).

Pincite

139 So. 907 (Irwin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.