Irwin v. Riegelmann

184 A.D. 899

This text of 184 A.D. 899 (Irwin v. Riegelmann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Irwin v. Riegelmann, 184 A.D. 899 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1918).

Opinion

On this motion for judgment on the pleadings, the pleadings only should be considered. (Standard Fashion Co. v. Thompson, 137 App. Div. 588; Ship v. Fridenberg, 132 id. 782.) The answer is sufficient as against that motion, and the order is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Rich, Putnam and Kelly, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Standard Fashion Co. v. Thompson
137 A.D. 588 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
184 A.D. 899, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/irwin-v-riegelmann-nyappdiv-1918.