Irwin v. Pickwick Stages System, Incorporated

California Court of Appeal

Irwin v. Pickwick Stages System, Incorporated

1 P.2d 1031, 115 Cal. App. 767, 1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 737

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedJuly 7, 1931

DocketDocket No. 7821.

StatusPublished

This text of 1 P.2d 1031 (Irwin v. Pickwick Stages System, Incorporated) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Irwin v. Pickwick Stages System, Incorporated, 1 P.2d 1031, 115 Cal. App. 767, 1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 737 (Cal. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion by respondent for an order dismissing the appeal on the ground that appellants have failed to comply with the provisions of section 953c of the Code of Civil Procedure and rule VIII of the Rules of the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal.

[1] This case grew out of the same occurrence as that involved in William Richard Irwin v. Pickwick Stages System,Incorporated, and R.I. Bailey (Civil No. 7819), ante, p. 372 [1 P.2d 1030], motion to dismiss appeal in which has been this day denied. The questions raised on the present motion and the points of law involved are in all material respects the same as those in that action, and in consequence the decision there governs this case.

Motion denied.

Works, P.J., and Craig, J., concurred. *Page 768

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by respondent for an order dismissing the appeal on the ground that appellants have failed to comply with the provisions of section 953c of the Code of Civil Procedure and rule VIII of the Rules of the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal.

[1] This case grew out of the same occurrence as that involved in William Richard Irwin v. Pickwick Stages System,Incorporated, and R.I. Bailey (Civil No. 7819), ante, p. 372 [1 P.2d 1030], motion to dismiss appeal in which has been this day denied. The questions raised on the present motion and the points of law involved are in all material respects the same as those in that action, and in consequence the decision there governs this case.

Motion denied.

Works, P.J., and Craig, J., concurred. *Page 768

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 P.2d 1031, 115 Cal. App. 767, 1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 737, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/irwin-v-pickwick-stages-system-incorporated-calctapp-1931.