Irwin v. Oregon Ry. & Nav. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Irwin v. Oregon Ry. & Nav. Co.

28 F. 833, 1886 U.S. App. LEXIS 2370

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided October 15, 1886·Published

Opinion

Wallace, J.

I have carefully examined the brief and authorities submitted by the counsel for Mr. Villard on the petition for a rehearing, but am unable to see liow he, as a promoter and abettor of the acts which have worked an equitable wrong to the complainants, can escape responsibility to the same extent with the corporation he rep[834] resented. The petition for a rehearing has been considered on the merits; that is, as though the cause were here upon' a rehearing.

An order is directed denying the prayer of the petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wallace, J.

I have carefully examined the brief and authorities submitted by the counsel for Mr. Villard on the petition for a rehearing, but am unable to see liow he, as a promoter and abettor of the acts which have worked an equitable wrong to the complainants, can escape responsibility to the same extent with the corporation he rep[834] resented. The petition for a rehearing has been considered on the merits; that is, as though the cause were here upon' a rehearing.

An order is directed denying the prayer of the petition.

Irwin v. Oregon Ry. & Nav. Co., 28 F. 833, 1886 U.S. App. LEXIS 2370 (circtsdny 1886).

Pincite

28 F. 833 (Irwin v. Oregon Ry. & Nav. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.