Irwin v. Oregon Ry. & Nav. Co.

28 F. 833, 1886 U.S. App. LEXIS 2370

This text of 28 F. 833 (Irwin v. Oregon Ry. & Nav. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Irwin v. Oregon Ry. & Nav. Co., 28 F. 833, 1886 U.S. App. LEXIS 2370 (circtsdny 1886).

Opinion

Wallace, J.

I have carefully examined the brief and authorities submitted by the counsel for Mr. Villard on the petition for a rehearing, but am unable to see liow he, as a promoter and abettor of the acts which have worked an equitable wrong to the complainants, can escape responsibility to the same extent with the corporation he rep[834]*834resented. The petition for a rehearing has been considered on the merits; that is, as though the cause were here upon' a rehearing.

An order is directed denying the prayer of the petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 F. 833, 1886 U.S. App. LEXIS 2370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/irwin-v-oregon-ry-nav-co-circtsdny-1886.