Home/Supreme Court/Irwin v. Missouri Valley Bridge & Iron Co.

Irwin v. Missouri Valley Bridge & Iron Co.

275 U.S. 572, 48 S. Ct. 204
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 3, 1928
DocketNo. 361
StatusPublished

This text of 275 U.S. 572 (Irwin v. Missouri Valley Bridge & Iron Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Irwin v. Missouri Valley Bridge & Iron Co., 275 U.S. 572, 48 S. Ct. 204 (1928).

Opinion

The motion for leave to file petition for a rehearing herein, made after the expiration of the twenty-five days within which, under rule 30, the petition ought to have been filed, is granted. [573]*573But the Court, after consideration of the .full brief filed with the motion and the other briefs considered on the original hearing of the petition for certiorari, again denies the petition.

Messrs. Kemper K. Knapp, John R. Cochran, Frank E. Tyler and Joseph A. O’Donnell for petitioners. Messrs. Chester I. Long, Lee Bond and Fred B. Silsbee for respondent. See p. 540.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
275 U.S. 572, 48 S. Ct. 204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/irwin-v-missouri-valley-bridge-iron-co-scotus-1928.