Irwin v. Klein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Irwin v. Klein

247 A.D. 709

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Irwin v. Klein. Read the opinion of the Court — 243 A.D. 23 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 15, 1936·Published

Opinion

Action for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff, a police officer, while performing his duties as a motor cycle escort to an automobile used in taking moving pictures. The accident was the result of a collision between plaintiff’s motorcycle and the automobile, owned by defendant Klein and operated by a driver’hired by Klein. The automobile was being operated for the purposes of the other two defendants. Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Townley and Glennon, JJ.; O’Malley, J., dissents as to the defendant Paramount Publix Corporation and votes to reverse and dismiss the complaint as to said defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff, a police officer, while performing his duties as a motor cycle escort to an automobile used in taking moving pictures. The accident was the result of a collision between plaintiff’s motorcycle and the automobile, owned by defendant Klein and operated by a driver’hired by Klein. The automobile was being operated for the purposes of the other two defendants. Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Townley and Glennon, JJ.; O’Malley, J., dissents as to the defendant Paramount Publix Corporation and votes to reverse and dismiss the complaint as to said defendant.

Irwin v. Klein, 247 A.D. 709 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

247 A.D. 709 (Irwin v. Klein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.