Irwin v. Grand Trunk Railway Co. of Canada
This text of 128 A.D. 916 (Irwin v. Grand Trunk Railway Co. of Canada) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event. Held, that all the issues in the case, including the, question- of damages, must be determined under the laws' of Canada and that the finding of the jury that-the plaintiff was entitled to compensatory damages in this casé is contrary to and against the weight of the evidence. All concurred, except Spring and Robson, JJ., who dissented upon the ground that whether the plaintiff was entitled to "compensatory damages under the Canadian law was a question of fact for the jury and was properly disposed of by it.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
128 A.D. 916, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/irwin-v-grand-trunk-railway-co-of-canada-nyappdiv-1908.