Irwin v. Charles J. Tagliabue Manufacturing Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Irwin v. Charles J. Tagliabue Manufacturing Co.

269 A.D. 1045, 58 N.Y.S.2d 689

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 10, 1945

StatusPublished

This text of 269 A.D. 1045 (Irwin v. Charles J. Tagliabue Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Irwin v. Charles J. Tagliabue Manufacturing Co., 269 A.D. 1045, 58 N.Y.S.2d 689 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1945).

Pincite

Opinion

Action to recover specified portions of the proceeds of certain life insurance policies. The proceeds were paid to the defendant on June 26, 1936, and June 29, 1936. The action to recover, based on a breach of alleged agreements, made during the lifetime of the insured, to pay the same to the plaintiff, was begun on July 12, 1945. The defendant moved under rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the two causes of action therein were barred by the six-year Statute of Limitations. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 48.) The plaintiff, contended that the ten-year Statute of Limitations was applicable. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 53.) Order denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint reversed on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with $10 costs. The alleged causes of action set out in the complaint are barred by section 48 of the Civil Practice Act. (Mills v. Mills, 115 N. Y. 80; Wood v. Young, 141 N. Y. 211; Keys V. Leopold, 241 N. Y. 189; Cohen v. Hughes, 291 N. Y. 698.) Close, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Lewis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action to recover specified portions of the proceeds of certain life insurance policies. The proceeds were paid to the defendant on June 26, 1936, and June 29, 1936. The action to recover, based on a breach of alleged agreements, made during the lifetime of the insured, to pay the same to the plaintiff, was begun on July 12, 1945. The defendant moved under rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the two causes of action therein were barred by the six-year Statute of Limitations. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 48.) The plaintiff, contended that the ten-year Statute of Limitations was applicable. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 53.) Order denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint reversed on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with $10 costs. The alleged causes of action set out in the complaint are barred by section 48 of the Civil Practice Act. (Mills v. Mills, 115 N. Y. 80; Wood v. Young, 141 N. Y. 211; Keys V. Leopold, 241 N. Y. 189; Cohen v. Hughes, 291 N. Y. 698.) Close, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Lewis, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

269 A.D. 1045, 58 N.Y.S.2d 689, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/irwin-v-charles-j-tagliabue-manufacturing-co-nyappdiv-1945.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack