Irwin v. Anspacher

California Court of Appeal

Irwin v. Anspacher

129 Cal. App. 793

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedFebruary 20, 1933

DocketCiv. No. 8460

StatusPublished

This text of 129 Cal. App. 793 (Irwin v. Anspacher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Irwin v. Anspacher, 129 Cal. App. 793 (Cal. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

PARKER, J., pro tem.

This is a companion case to Irwin v. Murphy, ante, p. 713 [19 Pac. (2d) 292]. Upon agreement of counsel the decision in either of these cases was to control the decision of the other.

Judgment affirmed.

Tyler, P. J., and Knight, J., concurred.

X

A petition by appellant to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on April 20, 1933.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PARKER, J., pro tem.

This is a companion case to Irwin v. Murphy, ante, p. 713 [19 Pac. (2d) 292]. Upon agreement of counsel the decision in either of these cases was to control the decision of the other.

Judgment affirmed.

Tyler, P. J., and Knight, J., concurred.

X

A petition by appellant to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on April 20, 1933.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

129 Cal. App. 793, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/irwin-v-anspacher-calctapp-1933.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack