Irwin v. Anspacher

California Court of Appeal

Irwin v. Anspacher

129 Cal. App. 793

California Court of Appeal·Decided February 20, 1933·No. Civ. No. 8460·Published

Opinion

PARKER, J., pro tem.

This is a companion case to Irwin v. Murphy, ante, p. 713 [19 Pac. (2d) 292]. Upon agreement of counsel the decision in either of these cases was to control the decision of the other.

Judgment affirmed.

Tyler, P. J., and Knight, J., concurred.

X

A petition by appellant to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on April 20, 1933.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PARKER, J., pro tem.

This is a companion case to Irwin v. Murphy, ante, p. 713 [19 Pac. (2d) 292]. Upon agreement of counsel the decision in either of these cases was to control the decision of the other.

Judgment affirmed.

Tyler, P. J., and Knight, J., concurred.

X

A petition by appellant to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on April 20, 1933.

Irwin v. Anspacher, 129 Cal. App. 793 (Cal. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

129 Cal. App. 793 (Irwin v. Anspacher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related