Irwin Pentland v. State

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: August 22, 2018
• Docket: 14-18-00059-CR
• Status: Published

Opinion

Abatement Order filed August 22, 2018, 2018

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-18-00059-CR ____________

IRWIN PENTLAND, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 427th District Court Travis County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. D-1-DC-17-904036

ABATEMENT ORDER The trial court denied appellant’s motion to suppress his statement but did submit findings of fact and conclusions of law on the voluntariness of the statement. Article 38.22, section 6 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure requires the trial court to make written fact findings and conclusions of law as to whether a challenged statement was made voluntarily, even if appellant did not request them or object to their absence. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 38.22 § 6; Urias v. State, 155 S.W.3d 141, 142 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004). The statute is mandatory and the proper procedure to correct the error is to abate the appeal and direct the trial court to make the required findings and conclusions. See Tex. R. App. P. 44.4; Wicker v. State, 740 S.W.2d 779, 784 (Tex. Crim. App. 1987).

Accordingly, the trial court is directed to reduce to writing its findings of fact and conclusions of law on the voluntariness of appellant’s statement and have a supplemental clerk’s record containing those findings filed with the clerk of this court by September 21, 2018.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s active docket when the trial court’s findings and recommendations are filed in this court. The court will also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party.

PER CURIAM