Irwin Palchick v. Cedyco Corporation
This text of Irwin Palchick v. Cedyco Corporation (Irwin Palchick v. Cedyco Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 27, 2010.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-10-00283-CV
IRWIN PALCHICK, Appellant
V.
CEDYCO CORPORATION, Appellee
On Appeal from the 61st District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 2009-72103
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
According to the notice of appeal, this is an attempted appeal from an interlocutory order granting a new trial signed March 11, 2010. An order granting a new trial is a not an appealable interlocutory order. Fruehauf Corp. v. Carrillo, 848 S.W.2d 83, 84 (Tex. 1993) (per curiam). No clerk=s record has been filed, however, and this court has been unable to ascertain whether it has jurisdiction over the appeal. The clerk responsible for preparing the record informed the court that appellant did not make arrangements to pay for the record.
On April 23, 2010, notification was transmitted to all parties of the court’s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen days, appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). No response was filed.
Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Yates and Boyce.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Irwin Palchick v. Cedyco Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/irwin-palchick-v-cedyco-corporation-texapp-2010.