Irwin Palchick v. Cedyco Corporation

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 27, 2010·No. 14-10-00283-CV·Published

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 27, 2010.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-10-00283-CV

____________

IRWIN PALCHICK, Appellant

V.

CEDYCO CORPORATION, Appellee

On Appeal from the 61st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2009-72103

M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

According to the notice of appeal, this is an attempted appeal from an interlocutory order granting a new trial signed March 11, 2010.  An order granting a new trial is a not an appealable interlocutory order.  Fruehauf Corp. v. Carrillo, 848 S.W.2d 83, 84 (Tex. 1993) (per curiam).  No clerk=s record has been filed, however, and this court has been unable to ascertain whether it has jurisdiction over the appeal.  The clerk responsible for preparing the record informed the court that appellant did not make arrangements to pay for the record. 

On April 23, 2010, notification was transmitted to all parties of the court’s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen days, appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court with proof of payment.  See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).  No response was filed.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Yates and Boyce.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Irwin Palchick v. Cedyco Corporation, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Irwin Palchick v. Cedyco Corporation (Irwin Palchick v. Cedyco Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fruehauf Corp. v. Carrillo
848 S.W.2d 83 (Texas Supreme Court, 1993)