Irwin Feuer v. Booth Steamship Co.

Second Circuit

Irwin Feuer v. Booth Steamship Co.

195 F.2d 529, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 2978

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedApril 17, 1952

Docket22258_1

StatusPublished

This text of 195 F.2d 529 (Irwin Feuer v. Booth Steamship Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Irwin Feuer v. Booth Steamship Co., 195 F.2d 529, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 2978 (2d Cir. 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

195 F.2d 529

Irwin FEUER et al., Appellants,
v.
BOOTH STEAMSHIP CO., Appellee.

No. 200.

Docket 22258.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued March 5, 1952.

Decided April 17, 1952.

On appeal by the libellants from a decree in the admiralty of the District Court for the Southern District of New York, 99 F.Supp. 232, dismissing a libel for loss of cargo due to the stranding of the respondent's vessel on a reef off the port of Maranhao, Brazil.

Bigham, Englar, Jones & Houston, Henry N. Longley, and F. Herbert Prem, all of New York City, for appellants.

Haight, Deming, Gardner, Poor & Havens and Wharton Poor, New York City, argued James McKown, Jr., New York City, of counsel, for appellee.

Before L. HAND, AUGUSTUS N. HAND and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the opinion below, American Cyanamid Co. v. Booth S.S. Co., D.C., 99 F.Supp. 232.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI