Irvona Coal & Coke Co. v. Commissioner

18 B.T.A. 298, 1929 BTA LEXIS 2084
United States Board of Tax Appeals·Decided November 20, 1929·No. Docket No. 23184.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[300] OPINION.

Phillips:

The petitioner defends against the collection of the deficiency in tax asserted against it by the Commissioner and assessed in 1924, but not yet collected, on the ground that collection thereof is barred by statute. It will be noted that the so-called waiver relates to assessment, that by reason of the action of the Commissioner it expired on April 1, 1924 (Wirt Franklin, 7. B. T. A. 636), and that the assessment here in question was made prior to the passage of the Revenue Act of 1924. The position of the petitioner is well taken. Russell v. United States, 278 U. S. 181; C. B. Schaffer, 12 B. T. A. 298; Edwin J. Schoettle Co., 13 B. T. A. 950; J. F. Anderson Lumber Co., 15 B. T. A. 475.

Collection of the additional assessment is barred by the statute of limitations and an order to that effect, pursuant to section 906(e) of the Revenue Act of 1924, as amended by section 1000 of the Revenue Act of 1926, will be entered.

Reviewed by the Board.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Irvona Coal & Coke Co. v. Commissioner, 18 B.T.A. 298, 1929 BTA LEXIS 2084 (bta 1929).

18 B.T.A. 298 (Irvona Coal & Coke Co. v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Irvona Coal & Coke Co. v. Commissioner
18 B.T.A. 298 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1929)