Irving W. Rice Co. v. United States

62 Cust. Ct. 1070, 1969 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3380
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedFebruary 26, 1969
DocketNo. P69/55; protests 67/12134, etc. (New York)
StatusPublished

This text of 62 Cust. Ct. 1070 (Irving W. Rice Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Irving W. Rice Co. v. United States, 62 Cust. Ct. 1070, 1969 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3380 (cusc 1969).

Opinion

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of finished glass atomizer bases; that the merchandise in its imported condition possesses no independent function and is solely used when attached to -and assembled with other substantial components thereby comprising a complete atomizer; and following the principles set forth in William Adams, Inc. v. United States (56 Cust. Ct. 429, C.D. 2670), the claim of the nlaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

William Adams, Inc. v. United States
56 Cust. Ct. 429 (U.S. Customs Court, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
62 Cust. Ct. 1070, 1969 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/irving-w-rice-co-v-united-states-cusc-1969.