Irving W. Rice Co. v. United States
This text of 62 Cust. Ct. 1070 (Irving W. Rice Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of finished glass atomizer bases; that the merchandise in its imported condition possesses no independent function and is solely used when attached to -and assembled with other substantial components thereby comprising a complete atomizer; and following the principles set forth in William Adams, Inc. v. United States (56 Cust. Ct. 429, C.D. 2670), the claim of the nlaintiffs was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
62 Cust. Ct. 1070, 1969 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/irving-w-rice-co-v-united-states-cusc-1969.