Irving v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Irving v. State

397 S.W.3d 538, 2013 WL 1739041, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 466

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 16, 2013·No. No. ED 98889·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Antwone D. Irving appeals from the motion court’s denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 29.15.¹ We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons [539] for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Antwone D. Irving appeals from the motion court’s denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 29.15.¹ We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons [539] for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Footnotes

Irving v. State, 397 S.W.3d 538, 2013 WL 1739041, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 466 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

397 S.W.3d 538 (Irving v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.