Irving v. Clarke

Fourth Circuit

Irving v. Clarke

670 F. App'x 804

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 21, 2016·No. No. 16-6705·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Angelo Marcellus Irving appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reopen the time to appeal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Irving v. Clarke, No. 3:14-cv-00571-JAG (E.D. Va. Apr. 29,2016), We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Angelo Marcellus Irving appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reopen the time to appeal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Irving v. Clarke, No. 3:14-cv-00571-JAG (E.D. Va. Apr. 29,2016), We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Irving v. Clarke, 670 F. App'x 804 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

670 F. App'x 804 (Irving v. Clarke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.