Irving Trust Co. v. Oak Ridge Golf Club, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Irving Trust Co. v. Oak Ridge Golf Club, Inc.

248 A.D. 738

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 248 A.D. 738 (Irving Trust Co. v. Oak Ridge Golf Club, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Irving Trust Co. v. Oak Ridge Golf Club, Inc., 248 A.D. 738 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Order denying defendant-appellant’s motion to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and sale or, in the alternative, to strike therefrom a direction for the sale of personal property affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. In our opinion, the total mortgage indebtedness was not reduced to $300,000 or less, for the reason that the indebtedness sought to be foreclosed, in accordance with the terms of the mortgage and the provision in the judgment, is not $150,000 but is $169,749.82. In any event, we are of opinion that the application should be denied in the exercise of discretion in the circumstances here disclosed and particularly in view of the fact that the mortgagor has breached the covenants of the same instrument which it seeks to invoke. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying defendant-appellant’s motion to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and sale or, in the alternative, to strike therefrom a direction for the sale of personal property affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. In our opinion, the total mortgage indebtedness was not reduced to $300,000 or less, for the reason that the indebtedness sought to be foreclosed, in accordance with the terms of the mortgage and the provision in the judgment, is not $150,000 but is $169,749.82. In any event, we are of opinion that the application should be denied in the exercise of discretion in the circumstances here disclosed and particularly in view of the fact that the mortgagor has breached the covenants of the same instrument which it seeks to invoke. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

248 A.D. 738, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/irving-trust-co-v-oak-ridge-golf-club-inc-nyappdiv-1936.