Irving Trust Co. v. Gunder
Opinion
This motion to confirm the report of the referee is granted. His comprehensive discussion of the three matters referred to him by the interlocutory judgment (See memorandum opinion, N. Y. L. J. Nov. 28, 1933) makes unnecessary further remark upon the facts and figures which the report presents, and Quintal v. Greenstein (142 Misc, 854; affd., 236 App. Div. 719) [104]*104is conclusive of the legal principles to be applied. Since the defendant Cogswell has settled with the plaintiff by paying $12,500, that sum will be deducted from $569,471.86, the amount to which the referee found plaintiff entitled.
Submit findings, which should include the items of interest.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
152 Misc. 83 (Irving Trust Co. v. Gunder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.