Irving H. Wolfe & Co. v. Chasmore Construction Co.
This text of 129 Misc. 215 (Irving H. Wolfe & Co. v. Chasmore Construction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant could not defeat plaintiff’s right to commissions by attempting to insert in the proposed contract new and onerous provisions not originally furnished as terms of sale or exchange. The broker cannot be penalized for the failure of defendant. (Glaser v. Eisen Realty Co., Inc., 187 N. Y. Supp. 171; Davidson v. Stocky, 202 N. Y. 423; Tanenbaum v. Boehm, Id. 293; Brand v. Nagle, 122 App. Div. 490; Goodman v. Hess, 56 Misc. 482; Halprin v. Schachne, 27 id. 195.)
Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to appellant to abide the event.
All concur; present, Lydon, Levy and Crain, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
129 Misc. 215, 220 N.Y.S. 682, 1927 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 872, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/irving-h-wolfe-co-v-chasmore-construction-co-nysupct-1927.