Irving H. Wolfe & Co. v. Chasmore Construction Co.

129 Misc. 215, 220 N.Y.S. 682, 1927 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 872
New York Supreme Court·Decided March 25, 1927·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant could not defeat plaintiff’s right to commissions by attempting to insert in the proposed contract new and onerous provisions not originally furnished as terms of sale or exchange. The broker cannot be penalized for the failure of defendant. (Glaser v. Eisen Realty Co., Inc., 187 N. Y. Supp. 171; Davidson v. Stocky, 202 N. Y. 423; Tanenbaum v. Boehm, Id. 293; Brand v. Nagle, 122 App. Div. 490; Goodman v. Hess, 56 Misc. 482; Halprin v. Schachne, 27 id. 195.)

Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to appellant to abide the event.

All concur; present, Lydon, Levy and Crain, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Irving H. Wolfe & Co. v. Chasmore Construction Co., 129 Misc. 215, 220 N.Y.S. 682, 1927 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 872 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1927).

129 Misc. 215 (Irving H. Wolfe & Co. v. Chasmore Construction Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Davidson v. . Stocky
95 N.E. 753 (New York Court of Appeals, 1911)
Brand v. Nagle
122 A.D. 490 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1907)
Goodman v. Hess
56 Misc. 482 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1907)