Irving H. Propper v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Fifth Circuit

Irving H. Propper v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

212 F.2d 959, 45 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1521, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 4423, 45 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 1521

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedJune 2, 1954

Docket15102

StatusPublished

This text of 212 F.2d 959 (Irving H. Propper v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Irving H. Propper v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 212 F.2d 959, 45 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1521, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 4423, 45 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 1521 (5th Cir. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the motion filed by respondent, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, to dismiss the petition for review of the decision of the Tax Court of the United States in the above entitled cause for want of prosecution;

It appearing to the Court that the transcript of record was received by the Clerk of this Court on January 29, 1953, and on that date a requisition for the deposit to cover the estimated cost of Court and printing the record was mailed to the petitioner; on March 19, 1953, a second notice was mailed to said petitioner and up to the present date, no deposit or response was ever received, and therefore the case has never been docketed in this Court;

It is now ordered and adjudged by this Court that the case be duly docketed in this Court and the petition for review dismissed for want of prosecution and under Rule 16 of this Court.

Dismissed on motion of petitioner for want of prosecution and under Rule 16.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the motion filed by respondent, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, to dismiss the petition for review of the decision of the Tax Court of the United States in the above entitled cause for want of prosecution;

It appearing to the Court that the transcript of record was received by the Clerk of this Court on January 29, 1953, and on that date a requisition for the deposit to cover the estimated cost of Court and printing the record was mailed to the petitioner; on March 19, 1953, a second notice was mailed to said petitioner and up to the present date, no deposit or response was ever received, and therefore the case has never been docketed in this Court;

It is now ordered and adjudged by this Court that the case be duly docketed in this Court and the petition for review dismissed for want of prosecution and under Rule 16 of this Court.

Dismissed on motion of petitioner for want of prosecution and under Rule 16.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

212 F.2d 959, 45 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1521, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 4423, 45 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 1521, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/irving-h-propper-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue-ca5-1954.