Irvine v. Meeks
502 N.E.2d 1006, 68 N.Y.2d 939, 510 N.Y.S.2d 91, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 20886
This text of 502 N.E.2d 1006 (Irvine v. Meeks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Irvine v. Meeks, 502 N.E.2d 1006, 68 N.Y.2d 939, 510 N.Y.S.2d 91, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 20886 (N.Y. 1986).
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs (see, Shinder v State of New York, 62 NY2d 945; Napolitano v County of Suffolk, 61 NY2d 863).
Concur: Chief Judge Wacthler and Judges Meyer, Simons, [941]*941Alexander and Titone. Taking no part: Judges Kaye and Hancock, Jr.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Napolitano v. County of Suffolk
462 N.E.2d 1179 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
Shinder v. State
468 N.E.2d 27 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
502 N.E.2d 1006, 68 N.Y.2d 939, 510 N.Y.S.2d 91, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 20886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/irvine-v-meeks-ny-1986.