Irvine v. Meeks
502 N.E.2d 1006, 68 N.Y.2d 939, 510 N.Y.S.2d 91, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 20886
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs (see, Shinder v State of New York, 62 NY2d 945; Napolitano v County of Suffolk, 61 NY2d 863).
Concur: Chief Judge Wacthler and Judges Meyer, Simons, [941] Alexander and Titone. Taking no part: Judges Kaye and Hancock, Jr.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Irvine v. Meeks, 502 N.E.2d 1006, 68 N.Y.2d 939, 510 N.Y.S.2d 91, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 20886 (N.Y. 1986).
502 N.E.2d 1006 (Irvine v. Meeks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Napolitano v. County of Suffolk
462 N.E.2d 1179 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
Shinder v. State
468 N.E.2d 27 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)