Irvine v. Irvine

88 A. 377, 81 N.J. Eq. 20, 11 Buchanan 20, 1912 N.J. Ch. LEXIS 15
New Jersey Court of Chancery·Decided October 24, 1912·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Emery, Y. C.

This is a bill for alimony and maintenance under the statute, and an application for temporary alimony. The affidavits of the wife as to the circumstances of the separation and the refusal to support, are flatly contradicted by. the husband, but, on considering all the affidavits, I think those upon the part of the wife present a prima facie case entitling her to a trial of the question whether the circumstances of the separation were such as to make the husband’s present offer pending suit, of rooms to [21] live in with him, no defence to the suit, because not made with any right to expect it to be accepted.

In the meantime, the husband’s legal obligation to support his wife continues and he should contribute thereto. An order should be advised for alimony penclente lite, at the rate of $7.50 per week, from September 17th, 1912, and a counsel fee of $30, pajrable within thirty days.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Irvine v. Irvine, 88 A. 377, 81 N.J. Eq. 20, 11 Buchanan 20, 1912 N.J. Ch. LEXIS 15 (N.J. Ct. App. 1912).

88 A. 377 (Irvine v. Irvine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tracey v. Tracey
174 A.2d 361 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1961)
Wiener v. Wiener
8 A.2d 372 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1939)