Irvine v. Davy
26 P. 506, 88 Cal. 495, 1891 Cal. LEXIS 722
Opinion
The demurrers to the complaint, on the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, were properly overruled.
The default of the defendants for failing to answer the complaint within the time allowed bylaw for]answering was properly entered. The filing of an answer after the default had been entered did not affect the default.
The motion to set aside said default was properly denied, no ground appearing for setting said default aside.
Judgment affirmed.
McFarland, J., and De Haven, J., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Irvine v. Davy, 26 P. 506, 88 Cal. 495, 1891 Cal. LEXIS 722 (Cal. 1891).
26 P. 506 (Irvine v. Davy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Munger v. Nelson
201 P. 286 (Montana Supreme Court, 1921)
Andreen v. Andreen
115 P. 761 (California Court of Appeal, 1911)
Harr v. Kight
108 P. 539 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1910)