Irvine v. Davy

California Supreme Court

Irvine v. Davy

26 P. 506, 88 Cal. 495, 1891 Cal. LEXIS 722

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 30, 1891

DocketNo. 13188

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 26 P. 506 (Irvine v. Davy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Irvine v. Davy, 26 P. 506, 88 Cal. 495, 1891 Cal. LEXIS 722 (Cal. 1891).

Pincite

Opinion

Sharfstein, J.

The demurrers to the complaint, on the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, were properly overruled.

The default of the defendants for failing to answer the complaint within the time allowed bylaw for]answering was properly entered. The filing of an answer after the default had been entered did not affect the default.

The motion to set aside said default was properly denied, no ground appearing for setting said default aside.

Judgment affirmed.

McFarland, J., and De Haven, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI