Irvin v. Sebastian

1 Ark. 33
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided January 15, 1845·Published

Opinion

Oldham, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

. The objections raised by the demurrer to the plaintiff’s declaration are wholly frivolous and untenable. The declaration has described the instrument sued on according to its legal effect, and dpes not attempt to set it out in Iicbc verba; and had it so attempted to describe it, the objections raised by the demurrer would not avail the defendants. The doctrine of idem sonans applies in this case as well as in any other. The circuit court should have overruled the demurrer; wherefore the judgment is reversed and this cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Irvin v. Sebastian, 1 Ark. 33 (Ark. 1845).

1 Ark. 33 (Irvin v. Sebastian) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.