Irvin Alexander Flores v. State
Opinion
Opinion issued June 4, 2015
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-15-00229-CR ——————————— IRVIN ALEXANDER FLORES, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Case No. MD-0348748
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Irvin Alexander Flores, has neither established indigence, nor
paid, or made arrangements to pay, the fee for preparing the clerk=s record. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 20.2, 37.3(b). After being notified that this appeal was subject to
dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b);
Sutherland v. State, 132 S.W.3d 510, 511–12 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.]
2004, no pet.) (dismissing criminal appeal for want of prosecution based on
appellant’s failure to pay for clerk’s record). We dismiss all pending motions as
moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Massengale.
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Irvin Alexander Flores v. State (Irvin Alexander Flores v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.