Irvin Alexander Flores v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 4, 2015·No. 01-15-00229-CR·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued June 4, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-15-00229-CR ——————————— IRVIN ALEXANDER FLORES, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Case No. MD-0348748

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Irvin Alexander Flores, has neither established indigence, nor

paid, or made arrangements to pay, the fee for preparing the clerk=s record. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 20.2, 37.3(b). After being notified that this appeal was subject to

dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b);

Sutherland v. State, 132 S.W.3d 510, 511–12 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.]

2004, no pet.) (dismissing criminal appeal for want of prosecution based on

appellant’s failure to pay for clerk’s record). We dismiss all pending motions as

moot.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Massengale.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Irvin Alexander Flores v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Irvin Alexander Flores v. State (Irvin Alexander Flores v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sutherland v. State
132 S.W.3d 510 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2004)