Irven Green v. United States

332 F.2d 788
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided July 15, 1964·No. 20919_1·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of conviction and sentence in this moonshine conspiracy case are affirmed. The contention that no act of the appellant was proved within the statutory period of six years is not controlling since there was ample evidence of appellant’s connection with the conspiracy less than a month before the critical date of February 1, 1957, and there was no evidence to show that his connection with it had ended prior to the occasion of the overt acts which occurred within the statutory period. See Pinkerton v. United States, 328 U.S. 640, 66 S.Ct. 1180, 90 L.Ed. 1489.

There is no merit in the contention while charged with participation in a single conspiracy dealing with separate stills, the proof showed two separate conspiracies. There were several distinct threads running through the actions of the parties m connection with all of the stills and this was sufficient to warrant submission to the jury of the question whether there wag sin le conspiracy embracing all four stills.

The judgment is affirmed,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Irven Green v. United States, 332 F.2d 788 (5th Cir. 1964).

332 F.2d 788 (Irven Green v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related