IRRIZARY v. State
This text of 28 So. 3d 226 (IRRIZARY v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We reverse the circuit court’s order of October 8, 2009, which dismissed Antonio Irrizary’s motion filed on September 8, 2009, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) for lack of jurisdiction. When it dismissed Mr. Irrizary’s motion, the circuit court was under the impression that the prior denial of a rule 3.800(a) motion raising related issues was pending on appeal. However, Mr. Irrizary had voluntarily dismissed that appeal, 2D09-3733, on September 9, 2009, approximately one month prior to rendition of the dismissal order in this case. Because the circuit court did have jurisdiction, we reverse and remand for the court to consider the merits of the motion filed on September 8, 2009.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
28 So. 3d 226, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 2233, 2010 WL 668772, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/irrizary-v-state-fladistctapp-2010.