IRRIZARY v. State

28 So. 3d 226, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 2233, 2010 WL 668772
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 26, 2010·No. 2D09-5190·Published

Opinion

SILBERMAN, Judge.

We reverse the circuit court’s order of October 8, 2009, which dismissed Antonio Irrizary’s motion filed on September 8, 2009, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) for lack of jurisdiction. When it dismissed Mr. Irrizary’s motion, the circuit court was under the impression that the prior denial of a rule 3.800(a) motion raising related issues was pending on appeal. However, Mr. Irrizary had voluntarily dismissed that appeal, 2D09-3733, on September 9, 2009, approximately one month prior to rendition of the dismissal order in this case. Because the circuit court did have jurisdiction, we reverse and remand for the court to consider the merits of the motion filed on September 8, 2009.

VILLANTI and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IRRIZARY v. State, 28 So. 3d 226, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 2233, 2010 WL 668772 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

28 So. 3d 226 (IRRIZARY v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Russell v. State
28 So. 3d 226 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)