Ironworkers Local No. 60 Training, Skill Improvement, Education and Apprenticeship Fund, by J. Kevin McDermott v. Department of Assessment of the City of Syracuse

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ironworkers Local No. 60 Training, Skill Improvement, Education and Apprenticeship Fund, by J. Kevin McDermott v. Department of Assessment of the City of Syracuse

221 A.D.2d 941, 635 N.Y.S.2d 549, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13426

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1995

DocketAppeal No. 2

StatusPublished

This text of 221 A.D.2d 941 (Ironworkers Local No. 60 Training, Skill Improvement, Education and Apprenticeship Fund, by J. Kevin McDermott v. Department of Assessment of the City of Syracuse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ironworkers Local No. 60 Training, Skill Improvement, Education and Apprenticeship Fund, by J. Kevin McDermott v. Department of Assessment of the City of Syracuse, 221 A.D.2d 941, 635 N.Y.S.2d 549, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13426 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted respondents’ motion to dismiss the petition brought pursuant to RPTL article 7. Although that [942]*942article was amended (L 1994, ch 563, eff July 26, 1994), the amendments are prospective only (see, Matter of Endicott Johnson Corp. v Assessor of Town of Union, 209 AD2d 759). Thus, the court properly determined that the amendments to RPTL 702 (3) and 704 (1) should not be applied retroactively. (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Roy, J.—Renewal.) Present—Pine, J. P., Fallon, Wesley, Doerr and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted respondents’ motion to dismiss the petition brought pursuant to RPTL article 7. Although that [942]*942article was amended (L 1994, ch 563, eff July 26, 1994), the amendments are prospective only (see, Matter of Endicott Johnson Corp. v Assessor of Town of Union, 209 AD2d 759). Thus, the court properly determined that the amendments to RPTL 702 (3) and 704 (1) should not be applied retroactively. (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Roy, J.—Renewal.) Present—Pine, J. P., Fallon, Wesley, Doerr and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

221 A.D.2d 941, 635 N.Y.S.2d 549, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13426, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ironworkers-local-no-60-training-skill-improvement-education-and-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack