Irons v. State

72 S.W.3d 619, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 835, 2002 WL 655407
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 23, 2002·No. No. ED 79633·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Johnathon Irons (Movant) appeals from a judgment denying his request for post-conviction relief under Rule 29.151 following an evidentiary hearing. Movant claims ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court’s judgment is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Irons v. State, 72 S.W.3d 619, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 835, 2002 WL 655407 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002).

72 S.W.3d 619 (Irons v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related