Irons v. State

898 So. 2d 278, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 5211, 2005 WL 856981
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 15, 2005
DocketNo. 5D05-762
StatusPublished

This text of 898 So. 2d 278 (Irons v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Irons v. State, 898 So. 2d 278, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 5211, 2005 WL 856981 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In view of the determination by the trial court that the judgment and sentence do not contain a special condition prohibiting the early termination of probation, we affirm. See Arriaga v. State, 666 So.2d 949 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); see also Best v. State, 679 So.2d 1236 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN, THOMPSON, and MONACO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Arriaga v. State
666 So. 2d 949 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Best v. State
679 So. 2d 1236 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
898 So. 2d 278, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 5211, 2005 WL 856981, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/irons-v-state-fladistctapp-2005.