Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Irons v. State

Irons v. State

898 So. 2d 278, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 5211, 2005 WL 856981
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Irons v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 851 So. 2d 798 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 15, 2005·No. No. 5D05-762·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In view of the determination by the trial court that the judgment and sentence do not contain a special condition prohibiting the early termination of probation, we affirm. See Arriaga v. State, 666 So.2d 949 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); see also Best v. State, 679 So.2d 1236 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN, THOMPSON, and MONACO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Irons v. State, 898 So. 2d 278, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 5211, 2005 WL 856981 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

898 So. 2d 278 (Irons v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Arriaga v. State
666 So. 2d 949 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Best v. State
679 So. 2d 1236 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)