Irons v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Irons v. State

104 So. 687, 20 Ala. App. 640, 1925 Ala. App. LEXIS 149

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 9, 1925

Docket8 Div. 245.

StatusPublished

This text of 104 So. 687 (Irons v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Irons v. State, 104 So. 687, 20 Ala. App. 640, 1925 Ala. App. LEXIS 149 (Ala. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

RICE, J.

The defendant was convicted of the offense of distilling, etc., and appeals.

*641 No brief has been filed on behalf of either the defendant or the state. Nothing new or novel is raised by any exception reserved during the trial. It would be of no value to discuss the testimony.

Suffice to say we have carefully read the record, and are of the opinion there was abundant evidence to support the verdict returned. It follows there was no error in refusing to give the general affirmative charge in defendant’s favor. Each exception taken on the admission or rejection of testimony has been considered, and in each instance we find the trial court’s action free from error.

Charge 2 requested by defendant, was, as pointed out by the trial court, unintelligible, and hence, was properly refused.

We find no prejudicial error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI