Irons v. Simeon L.

166 F. 781, 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 5465
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
DecidedApril 23, 1908
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 166 F. 781 (Irons v. Simeon L.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Irons v. Simeon L., 166 F. 781, 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 5465 (circtsdny 1908).

Opinion

RACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

I do not understand that the New York representative merely transmits offers to buy goods to the Connecticut [782]*782iactory, where the defendant decides whether it will accept or reject them, but that such representative makes binding- contracts with purchasers, and sends to Connecticut merely directions where to ship the goods. If this be so, the case is similar to Cone v. Tuscaloosa Mfg. Co. (C. C.) 76 Fed. 891, and the motion must be denied. If defendant believes it can show that the agent is a mere solicitor, who has no power to contract, and will pay the expenses of a hearing before a master to establish that fact, an order of reference will be made.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Franco-American Chemical Co. v. McKee Glass Co.
232 F. 198 (S.D. New York, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
166 F. 781, 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 5465, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/irons-v-simeon-l-circtsdny-1908.