Irons v. Simeon L.

166 F. 781, 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 5465
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided April 23, 1908·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

RACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

I do not understand that the New York representative merely transmits offers to buy goods to the Connecticut [782]*782iactory, where the defendant decides whether it will accept or reject them, but that such representative makes binding- contracts with purchasers, and sends to Connecticut merely directions where to ship the goods. If this be so, the case is similar to Cone v. Tuscaloosa Mfg. Co. (C. C.) 76 Fed. 891, and the motion must be denied. If defendant believes it can show that the agent is a mere solicitor, who has no power to contract, and will pay the expenses of a hearing before a master to establish that fact, an order of reference will be made.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Irons v. Simeon L., 166 F. 781, 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 5465 (circtsdny 1908).

166 F. 781 (Irons v. Simeon L.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Franco-American Chemical Co. v. McKee Glass Co.
232 F. 198 (S.D. New York, 1916)