Iron Workers District Council Of Southern Ohio & Vicinity Pension Trust v. Lykins Reinforcing Inc.

District Court, S.D. Ohio·Decided May 11, 2021·No. 3:20-cv-00007·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Iron Workers District Council Of Southern Ohio & Vicinity Pension Trust,

Plaintiff, Case No.: 3:20-cv-007

vs. District Judge Michael J. Newman Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington Lykins Reinforcing Inc.,

Defendant.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL: TERMINATION ENTRY

The Court, having been advised by counsel for the parties that the above-captioned matter has been settled, IT IS ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED, with prejudice as to all parties, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within thirty (30) days, reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. Parties intending to preserve this Court’s jurisdiction to enforce the settlement should be aware of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 511 U.S. 375, 381-82 (1994), and incorporate appropriate language in any judgment entry. The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement if necessary. IT IS SO ORDERED.

May 10, 2021 s/Michael J. Newman Hon. Michael J. Newman United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Iron Workers District Council Of Southern Ohio & Vicinity Pension Trust v. Lykins Reinforcing Inc., (S.D. Ohio 2021).

Iron Workers District Council Of Southern Ohio & Vicinity Pension Trust v. Lykins Reinforcing Inc. (Iron Workers District Council Of Southern Ohio & Vicinity Pension Trust v. Lykins Reinforcing Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America
511 U.S. 375 (Supreme Court, 1994)