Iron Ore Transport Co. v. The Steam Vessel Flying Foam

Fourth Circuit

Iron Ore Transport Co. v. The Steam Vessel Flying Foam

461 F.2d 779, 1972 A.M.C. 2692

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJune 13, 1972

DocketNos. 72-1185, 72-1186

StatusPublished

This text of 461 F.2d 779 (Iron Ore Transport Co. v. The Steam Vessel Flying Foam) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Iron Ore Transport Co. v. The Steam Vessel Flying Foam, 461 F.2d 779, 1972 A.M.C. 2692 (4th Cir. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This appeal arises out of the collision between the freighters RUTH LAKE and FLYING FOAM off the Virginia coast. The district court found both vessels at fault and decreed the division of damages. Upon consideration of the briefs, record and argument, we affirm on the opinion of the district court. Iron Ore Transport Co., Ltd. v. Steam Vessel FLYING FOAM, 343 F.Supp. 510 (E.D.Va.1971).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This appeal arises out of the collision between the freighters RUTH LAKE and FLYING FOAM off the Virginia coast. The district court found both vessels at fault and decreed the division of damages. Upon consideration of the briefs, record and argument, we affirm on the opinion of the district court. Iron Ore Transport Co., Ltd. v. Steam Vessel FLYING FOAM, 343 F.Supp. 510 (E.D.Va.1971).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

461 F.2d 779, 1972 A.M.C. 2692, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/iron-ore-transport-co-v-the-steam-vessel-flying-foam-ca4-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack