Iron Mountain Information Management, Inc. v. Pullman
This text of 41 A.D.3d 656 (Iron Mountain Information Management, Inc. v. Pullman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action for specific performance of a commercial lease providing options to renew and purchase, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the [657]*657Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Sproat, J.), dated September 8, 2006, as denied its motion for a preliminary injunction.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
In order to obtain a preliminary injunction (see CPLR 6301), the moving party must demonstrate (1) a likelihood of success on the merits, (2) an irreparable injury absent the injunction; and (3) a balancing of the equities in its favor (see Aetna Ins. Co. v Capasso, 75 NY2d 860 [1990]; Gerstner v Katz, 38 AD3d 835 [2007]). Under the circumstances of this case, the issuance of a preliminary injunction was not warranted. Miller, J.P., Mastro, Dillon and McCarthy, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
41 A.D.3d 656, 836 N.Y.S.2d 891, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/iron-mountain-information-management-inc-v-pullman-nyappdiv-2007.