Iron City National Bank v. Rafferty

56 A. 445, 207 Pa. 238, 1903 Pa. LEXIS 486
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 9, 1903·No. Appeal, No. 73·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

In affirming plaintiff’s second written prayer for instructions with the explanations and illustrations of the law determining the liability of sureties, the learned judge of the court below disposed of every substantial ground of controversy in this case. The jury having credited the testimony of Mr. Wright, the cashier of the bank, there is no error which can he reached by an appellate court.

All the assignments of error are overruled and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Iron City National Bank v. Rafferty, 56 A. 445, 207 Pa. 238, 1903 Pa. LEXIS 486 (Pa. 1903).

56 A. 445 (Iron City National Bank v. Rafferty) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Read v. Pennsylvania Co. Etc.
12 A.2d 925 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1940)
Putnam v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.
199 A. 211 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1938)
Lincoln Bank v. Gem City Wholesale Grocery Co.
133 A. 554 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1926)
Pine Grove National Bank v. Dietrich
7 Pa. D. & C. 470 (Schuylkill County Court of Common Pleas, 1926)
Miners State Bank v. Auksztokalnis
128 A. 726 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1925)
Homewood Peoples Bank v. Hastings
106 A. 308 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1919)
Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. Wilson
63 Pa. Super. 294 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1916)
Hartley Silk Manufacturing Co. v. Berg
48 Pa. Super. 419 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1911)