Irlbacker v. . Roth

New York Court of Appeals

Irlbacker v. . Roth

49 N.E. 1099, 155 N.Y. 664, 9 E.H. Smith 664, 1898 N.Y. LEXIS 979

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 22, 1898

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 49 N.E. 1099 (Irlbacker v. . Roth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Irlbacker v. . Roth, 49 N.E. 1099, 155 N.Y. 664, 9 E.H. Smith 664, 1898 N.Y. LEXIS 979 (N.Y. 1898).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs, upon the ground that it does not appear, either by the judgment or order of the Appellate Division, that the decision of that court was unanimous, with leave to renew upon payment of such costs, provided the record is so amended as to show that the judgment appealed from was rendered by the unanimous vote of all the judges who took part in the decision. (Kaplan v. N. Y. Biscuit Co., 151 N. Y. 171.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs, upon the ground that it does not appear, either by the judgment or order of the Appellate Division, that the decision of that court was unanimous, with leave to renew upon payment of such costs, provided the record is so amended as to show that the judgment appealed from was rendered by the unanimous vote of all the judges who took part in the decision. (Kaplan v. N. Y. Biscuit Co., 151 N. Y. 171.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 N.E. 1099, 155 N.Y. 664, 9 E.H. Smith 664, 1898 N.Y. LEXIS 979, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/irlbacker-v-roth-ny-1898.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack