Irlbacker v. . Roth

49 N.E. 1099, 155 N.Y. 664, 9 E.H. Smith 664, 1898 N.Y. LEXIS 979
New York Court of Appeals·Decided March 22, 1898·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs, upon the ground that it does not appear, either by the judgment or order of the Appellate Division, that the decision of that court was unanimous, with leave to renew upon payment of such costs, provided the record is so amended as to show that the judgment appealed from was rendered by the unanimous vote of all the judges who took part in the decision. (Kaplan v. N. Y. Biscuit Co., 151 N. Y. 171.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Irlbacker v. . Roth, 49 N.E. 1099, 155 N.Y. 664, 9 E.H. Smith 664, 1898 N.Y. LEXIS 979 (N.Y. 1898).

49 N.E. 1099 (Irlbacker v. . Roth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Lotz
15 Mills Surr. 379 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1915)