Irizary v. M & R, of: Citywide Comm Coun Serv
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
ANGIENEL ASTACIO IRIZARY A/K/A/ : No. 106 EAL 2019 ANGIENEL ASTACIO VALDEZ, AND : MOISES VALDEZ :
: Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court v. :
: :
M & R PROPERTY INVESTMENT & : MANAGEMENT, LLC, MODESTA : MOLINA AND ORLANDO RODRIGUEZ, : MOHAMMAD QUADIR,MOHAMMAD : ASHRA FUZZMAN, CITYWIDE : COMMUNITY SERVICES; JOSE RUIZ :
: :
PETITION OF: CITYWIDE COMMUNITY : SERVICES, MODESTA MOLINA AND : ORLANDO RODRIGUEZ :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 7th day of October, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Irizary v. M & R, of: Citywide Comm Coun Serv (Irizary v. M & R, of: Citywide Comm Coun Serv) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.