Irizary v. M & R, of: Citywide Comm Coun Serv

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 7, 2019·No. 106 EAL 2019·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

ANGIENEL ASTACIO IRIZARY A/K/A/ : No. 106 EAL 2019 ANGIENEL ASTACIO VALDEZ, AND : MOISES VALDEZ :

: Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court v. :

: :

M & R PROPERTY INVESTMENT & : MANAGEMENT, LLC, MODESTA : MOLINA AND ORLANDO RODRIGUEZ, : MOHAMMAD QUADIR,MOHAMMAD : ASHRA FUZZMAN, CITYWIDE : COMMUNITY SERVICES; JOSE RUIZ :

: :

PETITION OF: CITYWIDE COMMUNITY : SERVICES, MODESTA MOLINA AND : ORLANDO RODRIGUEZ :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 7th day of October, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Irizary v. M & R, of: Citywide Comm Coun Serv, (Pa. 2019).

Irizary v. M & R, of: Citywide Comm Coun Serv (Irizary v. M & R, of: Citywide Comm Coun Serv) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.