Iris Gantt v. Colvin Morgan

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: February 25, 2014
• Docket: 13-2168
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-2168

IRIS SAPP GANTT,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

COLVIN THOMAS MORGAN, a/k/a Tom Morgan, a/k/a C. T. Morgan, a/k/a Colvin T. Morgan; THURMO MEDICAL SLEEP PRODUCTS, INC.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, District Judge. (1:12-cv-01123-TDS-JLW)

Submitted: February 20, 2014 Decided: February 25, 2014

Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Iris Sapp Gantt, Appellant Pro Se. John F. Bloss, HIGGINS BENJAMIN PLLC, Greensboro, North Carolina; Daniel Charles Nash, MORGAN, HERRING, MORGAN, GREEN & ROSENBLUTT, LLC, High Point, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Iris Sapp Gantt, a pro se civil litigant, appeals the

district court’s order dismissing Gantt’s civil action for lack

of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. See Durden v. United States, 736 F.3d

296, 300 (4th Cir. 2013) (stating that dismissals for lack of

subject matter jurisdiction are reviewed de novo). Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See

Gantt v. Morgan, No. 1:12-cv-01123-TDS-JLW (M.D.N.C. Sept. 4,

2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED