Irey v. Pennsylvania R.

19 A. 341, 132 Pa. 563, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 853
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 24, 1890·No. No. 141·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The judgment of nonsuit was properly entei’ed. The evidence shows that the deceased lost his life as the result of his

own rashness. While waiting at the station to take the train for Phcenixville, under the mistaken belief that his own train

was just starting, he left the platform and ran across the tracks, directly in front of a passing train by which he was struck and killed. Had he looked he would have seen the approaching train and saved his life. It is idle to speak of the negligence of the defendant company; plaintiff’s own negligence was so palpable as to justify the judge below in withdrawing the case from the jury.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Irey v. Pennsylvania R., 19 A. 341, 132 Pa. 563, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 853 (Pa. 1890).

19 A. 341 (Irey v. Pennsylvania R.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tiers v. Pennsylvania Railroad
141 A. 487 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1927)
Keifner v. Pittsburg, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.
72 A. 253 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1909)
Foreman v. Pennsylvania R. R.
28 A. 358 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1894)