Irene Pena v. R. J. Griffin & Company

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 30, 2011
Docket13-10-00306-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Irene Pena v. R. J. Griffin & Company (Irene Pena v. R. J. Griffin & Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Irene Pena v. R. J. Griffin & Company, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

                                       NUMBER 13-10-00306-CV

                                 COURT OF APPEALS

                     THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                         CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

IRENE PENA,                                                                                   Appellant,

                                                             v.

R. J. GRIFFIN & COMPANY, ET AL.,                                           Appellees.

                             On Appeal from the 275th District Court

                                        of Hidalgo County, Texas.

                               MEMORANDUM OPINION

             Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam


This appeal was abated by this Court on June 16, 2010, and the parties were ordered to mediation.  On July 26, 2010, the mediator notified this Court that the parties had settled all issues and the Clerk of the Court notified the parties that they should file a motion to dismiss the appeal.  On December 14, 2010, the parties notified the Court that the settlement was still in process.  On May 16, 2011, this Court sent a letter to the parties inquiring as to the status of the settlement and received no response.  On July 21, 2011, the Court ordered the parties to file an advisory regarding the status of the appeal and, if applicable, a motion to reinstate the appeal or a motion to dismiss the appeal.  The order notified the parties that failure to respond to the order would result in the dismissal of the appeal for want of prosecution. 

The parties have failed to respond.  Accordingly, we reinstate and dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

30th day of August, 2011.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Irene Pena v. R. J. Griffin & Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/irene-pena-v-r-j-griffin-company-texapp-2011.