Irene Pena v. R. J. Griffin & Company
Opinion
NUMBER 13-10-00306-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________
IRENE PENA, Appellant,
v.
R. J. GRIFFIN & COMPANY, ET AL., Appellees. ____________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 275th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
This appeal was abated by this Court on June 16, 2010, and the parties were
ordered to mediation. On July 26, 2010, the mediator notified this Court that the parties
had settled all issues and the Clerk of the Court notified the parties that they should file a
motion to dismiss the appeal. On December 14, 2010, the parties notified the Court that the settlement was still in process. On May 16, 2011, this Court sent a letter to the
parties inquiring as to the status of the settlement and received no response. On July 21,
2011, the Court ordered the parties to file an advisory regarding the status of the appeal
and, if applicable, a motion to reinstate the appeal or a motion to dismiss the appeal.
The order notified the parties that failure to respond to the order would result in the
dismissal of the appeal for want of prosecution.
The parties have failed to respond. Accordingly, we reinstate and dismiss the
appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b).
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 30th day of August, 2011.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Irene Pena v. R. J. Griffin & Company (Irene Pena v. R. J. Griffin & Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.