Irene Hill, Administratrix of the Estate of Benjamin Hill, Deceased v. Waterman Steamship Corporation
Opinion
This case is squarely ruled against the appellant by our prior decisions in Klingseisen v. Costanzo Transp. Co., 3 Cir., 1939, 101 F.2d 902, and Curtis v. A. Garcia y Cia., 3 Cir., 1957, 241 F.2d 30. We are, however, urged by the appellant to overrule those cases and now hold that the admiralty doctrine of comparative negligence is to be applied in a suit under the Pennsylvania Wrongful Death Act, 12 P.S. § 1601 et seq., for the death of a longshoreman on board a vessel in the port of Philadelphia instead of the Pennsylvania contributory negligence rule. We are satisfied, however, that the cases cited were correctly decided and we will accordingly follow and apply the rule laid down in them.
The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
251 F.2d 655 (Irene Hill, Administratrix of the Estate of Benjamin Hill, Deceased v. Waterman Steamship Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.