Irene Hill, Administratrix of the Estate of Benjamin Hill, Deceased v. Waterman Steamship Corporation

251 F.2d 655, 1958 A.M.C. 1098
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided February 6, 1958·No. 12329·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case is squarely ruled against the appellant by our prior decisions in Klingseisen v. Costanzo Transp. Co., 3 Cir., 1939, 101 F.2d 902, and Curtis v. A. Garcia y Cia., 3 Cir., 1957, 241 F.2d 30. We are, however, urged by the appellant to overrule those cases and now hold that the admiralty doctrine of comparative negligence is to be applied in a suit under the Pennsylvania Wrongful Death Act, 12 P.S. § 1601 et seq., for the death of a longshoreman on board a vessel in the port of Philadelphia instead of the Pennsylvania contributory negligence rule. We are satisfied, however, that the cases cited were correctly decided and we will accordingly follow and apply the rule laid down in them.

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Irene Hill, Administratrix of the Estate of Benjamin Hill, Deceased v. Waterman Steamship Corporation, 251 F.2d 655, 1958 A.M.C. 1098 (3d Cir. 1958).

251 F.2d 655 (Irene Hill, Administratrix of the Estate of Benjamin Hill, Deceased v. Waterman Steamship Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Scott v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.
399 F.2d 14 (Third Circuit, 1967)
Madeline Curry, Etc. v. Fred Olsen Line, Etc.
367 F.2d 921 (Ninth Circuit, 1966)
Vassallo v. Nederl-Amerik Stoomv Maats Holland
337 S.W.2d 309 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1960)
Holley v. Stansfield
269 F.2d 317 (Fourth Circuit, 1959)
Holley v. The Steamship Manfred Stansfield
269 F.2d 317 (Fourth Circuit, 1959)
Holley v. Manfred Stansfield
165 F. Supp. 660 (E.D. Virginia, 1958)