Irene Gill v. James Felts
226 F.2d 407
This text of 226 F.2d 407 (Irene Gill v. James Felts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Irene Gill v. James Felts, 226 F.2d 407 (10th Cir. 1955).
Opinion
Judgment in the sum of $3,000 was entered herein against the defendants Clyde Woodrow Gill and Irene Gill, husband and wife. Irene Gill appealed. Clyde Woodrow Gill did not. The judgment has been paid in full. A satisfaction thereof is in the record and its validity is not questioned. Accordingly, the appeal is
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
226 F.2d 407, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/irene-gill-v-james-felts-ca10-1955.