IRENA I. CHARLES vs STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of IRENA I. CHARLES vs STATE OF FLORIDA (IRENA I. CHARLES vs STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
IRENA I. CHARLES
Petitioner,
v. Case No. 5D22-559 LT Case No. 42-2012-CF-2167-A-Y
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent.
________________________________/
Opinion filed June 24, 2022
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, A Case of Original Jurisdiction.
Irena I. Charles, Lowell, pro se.
No Appearance for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Due to Petitioner’s apparent abuse of the legal process by his abusive,
repetitive, malicious, or frivolous pro se filings attacking his judgments and
sentences in Marion County Circuit Court Case Number 42-2012-CF-2167-
A-Y, this Court issued an order directing Petitioner to show cause why he
should not be prohibited from future pro se filings. See State v. Spencer, 751
So. 2d 47, 48 (Fla. 1999). Having carefully considered the response and finding it fails to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed, we
conclude that Petitioner is abusing the judicial process and should be barred
from further pro se filings.
In order to conserve judicial resources, Petitioner is prohibited from
filing with this Court any further pro se filings concerning Marion County
Circuit Court Case No. 42-2012-CF-2167-A-Y. The Clerk of this Court is
directed not to accept any further pro se filings concerning the referenced
case. The Clerk will summarily reject any future filings regarding the
referenced case unless filed by a member in good standing of The Florida
Bar. See Isley v. State, 652 So. 2d 409, 411 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (“Enough
is enough.”). The Clerk is further directed to forward a certified copy of this
opinion to the appropriate institution for consideration of disciplinary
proceedings. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2019); Simpkins v. State, 909 So.
2d 427, 428 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005).
PETITIONER PROHIBITED FROM ANY FURTHER PRO SE FILINGS.
COHEN, WALLIS and NARDELLA, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
IRENA I. CHARLES vs STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/irena-i-charles-vs-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2022.