Irby v. SUBURBAN MOBILITY AUTHORITY FOR REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION
720 N.W.2d 311, 476 Mich. 866, 2006 Mich. LEXIS 1661
Opinion
Cornelius IRBY, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
SUBURBAN MOBILITY AUTHORITY FOR REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION, a/k/a Smart, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 24, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Irby v. SUBURBAN MOBILITY AUTHORITY FOR REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION, 720 N.W.2d 311, 476 Mich. 866, 2006 Mich. LEXIS 1661 (Mich. 2006).
720 N.W.2d 311 (Irby v. SUBURBAN MOBILITY AUTHORITY FOR REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.