Irby v. State of Nevada, Nevada State Controller

Opinion

1 2 3 6 * * * 7 TIMOTHY JEROME IRBY, Case No. 2:25-cv-00936-RFB-EJY 8 Plaintiff, ORDER 9 v. 10 STATE OF NEVADA, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 14 Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 3) of the 15 Honorable Elayna J. Youchah, United States Magistrate Judge, entered on June 3, 2025. A 16 district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or 17 recommendations made by the magistrate.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). A party may file specific 18 written objections to the findings and recommendations of a magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. § 19 636(b)(1); Local Rule IB 3-2(a). When written objections have been filed, the district court is 20 required to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed 21 findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Local 22 Rule IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, a district court is not required to conduct 23 “any review,” de novo or otherwise, of the report and recommendations of a magistrate judge. 24 Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2(a), objections were 25 due by June 17, 2025. No objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the record in 26 this case and concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation. 27 /// 28 /// ] IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 3) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full. 3 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice, but without leave to amend. 5 The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 6 7 DATED: June 27, 2025. 8 9 se 10 RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

-2-