Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Irby v. Allen & Co.

Irby v. Allen & Co.

126 S.E. 888, 33 Ga. App. 362, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 774
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 15, 1925
Docket16000
StatusPublished

This text of 126 S.E. 888 (Irby v. Allen & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Irby v. Allen & Co., 126 S.E. 888, 33 Ga. App. 362, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 774 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

Broyles, O. J.

Under tlie facts of the case the court did not err in awarding a nonsuit. See, in this connection, Isaac Silver & Brothers Co. v. Humphries, 29 Ga. App. 524 (1) (116 S. E. 54).

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodioorth, JJ., concur. J. V. Poole, for plaintiff. Dorsey, Brewster, Howell & Hey man, Mark Bolding, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McClure Ten Cent Co. v. Humphries
116 S.E. 54 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
126 S.E. 888, 33 Ga. App. 362, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 774, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/irby-v-allen-co-gactapp-1925.